Upfront: A house divided

0

County passes housing element—what does this mean for affordable housing in Marin?

by Peter Seidman

As the year rolled to an end, the county put a period on the next round of its housing element. The Board of Supervisors earlier this month on a unanimous vote approved the element, which guides housing development through 2023. Marin residents, however, remain far from unanimous about affordable housing and controlled development.

The meeting in which the supervisors approved the housing element lacked the viscous attacks and raucous behavior that had marked housing debates in the past few years. A lack of emotion-based vitriol may be a sign that county residents are ready to engage in a rational debate about how Marin should continue on its slow-growth path.

The county housing element that supervisors approved points the county in that continued slow-growth direction. Affordable housing advocates note that the county needs many more affordable housing units for its younger residents, its older residents, service workers who earn significantly less than the median income and the commuting workforce, whose members could become residents if they could afford housing in the county.

The latest housing element controversy, one that preceded the meeting during which the supervisors approved the element, concerned the county’s position, as outlined by county staff, that Marin should put more housing into the housing element than the state requires.

The suggestion almost immediately elicited a response that the county wanted to clear the way for rampant development, to get in bed with developers. The debate rose a few octaves after those allegations. The county explained that although the state requires only 185 housing units through 2023, potential development sites listed in the element might never be built, leaving the county with the task of finding alternate sites to meet the 185-unit mandate. Including more housing units than actually required gives the county a safety valve. If the county had enumerated only 185 units, and if, say, a developer could not build on one or more of the sites on which some of the units were located, the county would have to scramble to meet the state mandate, with possible negative consequences. Better safe than sorry was the thinking.

Although that does not satisfy the don’t-trust-government contingent, supervisors agreed with the concept. They did not, however, approve the full complement of housing units in the element as county planners had envisioned.

The board took the 419-unit proposal that had come from planners and cut it to 378 units. In that total number, the element as approved calls for 210 low-income units, 70 moderate-income units and 98 market-rate units. That’s for the entire unincorporated areas of the county through 2023. Hardly an earth-shattering number, say housing advocates. The number will not change life as we know it, as some anti-development proponents posit. Still, it’s an addition to the county’s housing stock, and it does add more below market-rate units than market-rate units.

Included in the 378 total number of housing units are 72 low-income and 10 market-rate units in Marinwood Plaza, the proposed development that triggered an eruption of the housing debate and led to the ousting of Supervisor Susan Adams, who has been an advocate of the project. She attempted to work with the community, with developers and planners, to create a project acceptable to everyone early in the planning stages. She said a transparent process from the start could result in a new kind of planning strategy for the county. But in the end, the strategy opened the process to raucous community meetings and gave her political opponents a chance to galvanize against her.

Also included in the approved housing element are 100 low-income units, 50 moderate-income units and 71 market-rate units in Silveira-St. Vincent’s; 15 low-income units in Marin City; 10 moderate-income units in Fairfax; and eight market-rate units in Novato.

Giving a nod to the suggestion that the county could go at least a ways toward meeting an affordable-housing need by encouraging second units, the housing element calls for 40 second units, 21 of which would be low-income, 10 of which would be moderate-income and nine of which would be market-rate.

That’s “would be” because although the county (or a city) puts units in a housing element, the designation just puts the units on a list of possible housing sites. All zoning requirements remain intact. The housing units in the element already are zoned. And any design review procedures for actual construction remain in force, as do planning requirements and strictures. Public meetings—and public debate—about possible housing units also remain, and will be on the agenda should developers craft a proposal for units in the housing element.

The county, supervisors and staff assured residents that any development proposal that gets submitted for any of the sites in the element will go through the gauntlet of approval for an ultimate decision.

The county and all Marin cities must submit periodic housing elements. They invariably trigger the argument that the state and its regional agencies are imposing their will on local jurisdictions. To some extent, that’s true. But there are reasons for the process, which is complicated and often misunderstood.

The Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) formed in 1961 when a majority of the cities and counties in the Bay Area agreed to join. It was the first council of local governments in the state. The formation was an outgrowth of a call the Bay Area Council made to resurrect a 1946 proposal to empower a regional agency to buy and operate the Bay Area’s major airports, seaports and bridges.

Local governments began looking at the possibility of creating a force that would advocate for their interests. That led to the birth of ABAG.

The housing element process starts at the California State Department of Housing and Community Development, which mandates that regional government councils assign housing requirements to local counties and cities. ABAG has jurisdiction over the nine Bay Area counties and the cities within those counties that are members of ABAG. (Corte Madera withdrew in protest over the number of housing units it was asked to include in its housing element.)

ABAG allocates a Regional Housing Need Determination (RHND) for local entities. Sometimes known as a “fair share housing allocation,” RHND numbers are issued at ABAG periodically based on projected job and population estimates.

How ABAG reaches its conclusions and sets its projected housing numbers involves a variety of modeling tools, according to Hing Wong, senior regional planner at ABAG. The tools include census data and financial data as well as employment statistics. About every two years, he says, ABAG creates a “projection forecast.” Based on those projections, ABAG allocates how many new housing units will be needed in which communities. The idea is that as part of the Bay Area, each community, each county, should create its fair share of housing.

The ABAG numbers must be incorporated into each jurisdiction’s housing element, which is part of each jurisdiction’s general plan. Housing elements are the only part of a city or county general plan that must receive state certification. If a city or county fails to meet housing targets, the state can grant funding. A city or county that fails to meet housing goals also can be vulnerable to court challenge. But if a community can prove that it has made a good-faith effort to meet housing numbers, that sometimes has been enough for the state, even if the community fails to meet the housing-need numbers.

The passage of SB 375, which ties development and transportation planning, aims to persuade communities to consider climate change and the impacts of regional planning, with a particular emphasis on reducing automobile travel. Among other mandates, the bill relaxes state air quality requirements for housing projects that meet goals for reducing greenhouse-gas emissions. The mandates include giving homebuilders incentives to develop higher-density projects near transit routes. Opponents find particular distaste in those measures.

That’s what caused a furor in Marin. Opponents say that increased density development along transit corridors, as in Marin Highway 101, will not increase the number of people who give up automobiles and will not reduce greenhouse-gas emissions. Proponents of the strategy obviously disagree.

Whatever the stand on emissions, it’s hard to argue that older adults, as well as young adults just starting out, may like to live in a higher-density development close to transportation and shops, giving them a different lifestyle than the traditional single-family, white-picket-fence paradigm. If people live within walking distance of the grocery store, would they drive? Even if added housing along the transportation corridor reduces greenhouse-gas emissions by an unappreciable amount, the added diversity of housing options for a changing population would benefit the county, say housing advocates.

It can be done without changing the essential character of the county by identifying appropriate locations and maintaining strict planning and design oversight. That’s not what happened in Corte Madera. The approval of the infamous WinCup development created a poster child for housing opponents. Marin doesn’t want a “WinCup South” and a WinCup North” could have been a rallying cry. But the WinCup project is a singular example of planning gone wrong—not a blueprint for widespread lifestyle destruction.

Higher-density housing can be done with a sensitive hand on the drafting board and an even more sensitive eye toward community style. A county like Marin should be an example for superlative design. (In reality, WinCup looks much better now that a new exterior treatment has covered a skeletal structure.) Higher-density projects can be stepped back into a property, giving the design the feeling of a single-family project. Many other architectural options can help a project fit in with the surrounding environment. It just takes vision.

Opponents of increasing the housing stock in the county continue to refer to higher density along the transportation corridor as “stack and pack.” The denigrating term is a remnant of the prejudice that first erupted when ABAG came to the county with housing-need numbers. “Alphabet agencies” is another code term opponents use to impart the belief that the state imposes its will on counties and cites, and that especially includes ABAG. If residents of the state want to abolish the process of setting housing-need numbers, they must do it in the halls of government in Sacramento, not in the halls of ABAG.

Proponents of higher densities along the Highway 101 corridor say that places like downtown San Rafael are appropriate for some development. The county housing element is a good start to the discussion of where higher-density development is appropriate. The debate will continue as developers propose actual projects. It’s a tough and important debate, one in which both sides should recognize the sincerity of the opposition.

Before the meeting during which county supervisors approved the housing element, dueling petitions highlighted the split in Marin over housing, higher-density development and affordable housing. One petition from opponents; one petition from proponents. On an optimistic note, there was a noticeable reduction in the volume of the public response that led up to the vote.

While the housing element gives the county—and its residents—a place to start a renewed debate as actual projects come up for consideration, the realties of housing and finance should set the stage. Although second units and infill are alternatives preferred by many, there just aren’t enough second units to satisfy demand. Developers need a certain amount of market-rate units to help make an affordable project possible. That means higher densities.

Unless current Marin residents want to continue living in a county in which their parents and their children can no longer live because of reduced housing options, Marinites must consider, and propose, realistic alternatives. Affordable housing developments can be designed as acceptable—even welcome—additions to the communities strung along the Highway 101 corridor with the proper design and planning oversight.

All it takes is compromise.

Contact the writer at pe***@ps******.com.

Feature: The getaway

0

Marin bars that offer a New Year’s chance for refreshment and contemplation

by Samantha Campos and Matthew Stafford

As the old year diminishes and the New Year beckons, reflection and contemplation become inevitable. What you need right about now is a moment to get away from it all, to think, to reconnect, maybe even to rediscover. The classic venue for reflection and contemplation is a saloon, particularly around New Year’s … as long as it isn’t too flossy, too popular, too familiar. It doesn’t have to be far away, and it doesn’t have to be for very long. A scenic hour’s drive on a stolen afternoon could do the trick. A barstool, a pint and some affable strangers can have rejuvenating powers—or, at the very least, the power to change your perspective.

Highway One or Shoreline Highway between Mill Valley and Stinson Beach and up to Point Reyes Station (and beyond) is a meandering two-lane stretch sure to induce nausea or frustration if you’re in a hurry or if you find yourself behind a bus. It can also be nirvana if you let it; taking the time to glide around bends, rolling your window down to breathe in the fresh scent of pine and eucalyptus, admiring the misty, verdant, moss-covered terrain or the magnificent vastness of our world’s largest and deepest sea. Sir Francis Drake Boulevard between Fairfax and Olema inspires a similar, albeit quieter, kind of awe. Venturing to these bars is about the journey as well as the destination.

Getaway bars in tucked-away places offer temporary solace from the demands of the holidays and the pressures of the coming year. They can be a respite for the overworked, an oasis for the overstimulated; a place where you can unplug, be anonymous and think your thoughts. And have another drink.

The Mountain Home Inn (810 Panoramic Highway, Mill Valley; 415/381-9000; mtnhomeinn.com) is Marin’s great top-of-the-world getaway. After a long and lovely drive through mist and forest you emerge on the flanks of our favorite alp, bay, ocean and Sequoia sempervirens stretching into the distance. The inn itself has been around in one form or another since 1912, and its venerable ambience adds to the establishment’s timeless quietude. The tiny blond-wood wine bar just off the lobby features such rustic touches as branch-frame barstools, dried-twig chandeliers and mounted snowshoes; or you can take your drink out on the balcony and inhale the perfume of the cypress, pines and redwoods in the canyon below. (If you over-imbibe, there are 10 inviting guestrooms on the premises with Jacuzzis, fireplaces and canopied beds.) This upscale aerie effortlessly complements the surrounding landscape and lets you enjoy the beauty and stillness of Mt. Tamalpais in meditative comfort.

Just past Muir Woods and a little further along Highway One, as the road begins its epic crawl up the coast, an enchanting ivy-clad tavern appears as if by wizardry. In fact, the magical Pelican Inn (10 Pacific Way, Muir Beach; 415/383-6000; pelicaninn.com) was built in the 1970s by an Englishman, Charles Felix, and his fledgling brood, who captured the romantic whimsy and rustic charm of a classic 16th century Tudor-style cottage. Its accompanying pub is likewise inspired and cozy, with a menu of traditional British country fare and a full range of ales and ports to quench thirsts and comfort ruminations.

No town in Marin could possibly embrace the “getaway” ethos more than Bolinas. Once you enter its notoriously hidden enclave and drive (slowly, please!) through its quaint village of art galleries and shops, the historic facade of Smiley’s Schooner Saloon & Hotel (41 Wharf Road, Bolinas; 415/868-1311; smileyssaloon.com) beckons you in with its utter lack of pretense, reasonably priced spirits and calendar of lively entertainment. Built in 1851 and surviving through Prohibition (under the guise of a barbershop), Smiley’s is the oldest continuously run bar west of Missouri. It’s also a faithful neighborhood hub, welcoming local dogs, denizens and travelers alike over a game of pool, the latest issue of Bolinas Hearsay News, or a drink and a ponderous moment.

Heading into Olema at the junction of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard and the coast highway, it’s hard to imagine that this tranquil village of 55 souls was once a raucous loggers’ boomtown of brothels, saloons and gambling dens. Nowadays, the traveler seeking a restorative libation after a misty, mysterious journey through Point Reyes National Seashore has fewer options for whistle-wetting, but among the town’s handful of shops and inns is the convivial Olema Farm House Restaurant (10005 California Highway 1, 415/663-1264). Housed in the village’s oldest structure, it has an abiding 19th century charm that invites you to escape the modern era. The bar is handsome and cozy with Tiffany lamps, a pressed-copper ceiling, fun decor (including a vintage tipsy Hamm’s Beer bear) and a civilized vibe that seems to bring out the wildness of West Marin. It’s pleasant indeed to sit at the bar, sip a brew and eat a dozen oysters from nearby Marshall, 21st century at bay.

Once you reach Point Reyes Station, its artisan markets and gustatory delights might distract you. Let them, and then hole up for a spell in the authentic Old Western Saloon (11201 California Highway 1, Point Reyes Station; 415/663-661). Another vestige of Marin’s past, the Old Western originally opened in the late 19th century in the adjacent building (now a barbershop), and then switched to its current location after the 1906 earthquake. During Prohibition, its speakeasy dwelled below, accessed by stairs beneath the piano (still there!). The upstairs housed a brothel, then a hotel, and now offices. The bar is fiercely reminiscent of that bygone era, and therefore suitable for reflection accompanied by a pint of one of their many draft beers.

Deep in the forests of the San Geronimo Valley—a place so limpid and magical that you wouldn’t expect to find anything there but toadstools, trolls and the occasional reindeer—one of Marin’s few remaining honest-to-God blue-collar bars beckons. The Papermill Creek Saloon (1 Castro Avenue, Forest Knolls, 415/488-9235) looks like a pickled-in-amber hangout from West Marin’s rugged past: neon, worn wood, jukebox, good ol’ boys playing liar’s dice at the bar. The joint comes by its vintage vibe honestly: It’s been around since 1907, originally as a general store, and has been selling hooch for 75 years. Named for the huge paper mill (the first in the West) Samuel P. Taylor built nearby, the saloon perches over rushing San Geronimo Creek, bringing a bit of the great outdoors to the surroundings. But the mood inside is warm and cozy, especially on a cool, drizzly night with a fire burning in the Franklin stove in the corner.

Farley Bar (601 Murray Circle, Fort Baker, Sausalito, 415/339-4750, cavallopoint.com) is a true urban oasis amid the pines, oaks and eucalipti of southernmost Marin. After a foggy, mildly spooky drive through the Marin Headlands, you find yourself on the shores of the Golden Gate in a plushly upholstered cocktail lounge ideal for the sipping of martinis and the slurping of oysters. The lush draperies, gleaming glassware, pressed-tin ceiling and exemplary liquor selection foster an elegant yet festive mood unique among Marin’s tucked-away watering holes. The magnificent redwood burl bar is a splendid place to unwind and reflect, or opt for one of the comfy armchairs by the fireplace or out on the veranda (blankets provided).

A few other Marin bars foster a temporary escape from the day-to-day as well. Enjoy a burger and a beer with your thoughts, overlooking the bay and the Golden Gate Bridge at the long-established and beloved dive bar of the Presidio Yacht Club (Fort Baker, Sommerville Road, Sausalito; 415/332-2319; presidioyachtclub.com). Reward yourself with live jazz, oysters and a martini at the elegant and homey Sand Dollar Restaurant & Bar (3458 Shoreline Highway, Stinson Beach; 415/868-0434; stinsonbeachrestaurant.com). Enjoy the rural ambience and down-home hospitality, backyard barbecues and outstanding live music of Rancho Nicasio (1 Old Rancheria Road, Nicasio; 662-2219; ranchonicasio.com) in a town where time stopped—and you can, too.

Offer to buy Sam and Matt a drink at le*****@pa********.com.

Talking Pictures: Wild and wooly

Html code here! Replace this with any non empty text and that's it.

MVFF audience applauds Laura Dern as she talks latest film ‘Wild’ 

by David Templeton

Laura Dern is leaning against the wall, at the rear of the Christopher B. Smith Rafael Film Center, as a series of clips plays on screen—Mask, Smooth Talk, Blue Velvet, Citizen Ruth, Jurassic Park, The Fault in Our Stars—each featuring a typically luminous performance by Dern. As she watches her greatest hits, the flickering light from the screen illuminates her, a look of reluctant wonder on her face. The Oscar-nominated actress (Rambling Rose) is present this October evening for a Mill Valley Film Festival screening of her latest film Wild, in which she plays the mother of Reese Witherspoon’s ex-addict redemption-seeker, walking 1,100 miles on the Pacific Crest Trail as flashbacks—that’s where Dern steps in—tells the story of how she got here.

Wild, directed by Jean-Marc Vallée (Dallas Buyers Club), is now officially in theaters, with Oscar handicappers singling out Witherspoon for a probable best actress nomination. Tonight’s audience, though, knowing that co-star Dern is in the house, is abuzz with talk that Dern should not be overlooked either, so key is her performance to the story of Wild.

“You were so young!” exclaims Festival Director Mark Fishkin, as Dern takes the stage after the clip reel is over. Dern was 18 years old when she appeared on screen for the first time in Mask and Smooth Talk, both released in 1985. Since then, she’s established herself as a truly versatile performer with a taste for off-the-wall material, and a drive to push herself with challenging projects. Tonight’s audience is filled with people who’ve watched her grow up on screen, as one enthusiastic fan shouts out—“We grew up with you, Laura! We love you!”—as Dern graciously acknowledges the crowd’s applause.

“Thank you so much! I love you, too!” she says, and maybe it’s just because she’s a great actress, but she certainly seems to mean it.

Film festivals are one of the rare opportunities for film fans to engage in face-to-face conversation with the people who make movies. That post-screening give-and-take, though formalized with moderators and volunteers running microphones out to the audience for each new question, often results in spontaneous moments as memorable as the films the movie-stars-of-the-moment have created.

One of the first questions, from a fan who’s read the book Wild, Cheryl Strayed’s best-seller on which the new movie is based, is about whether the book was useful in creating her character.

“It was a pure gift,” Dern says. “Anyone who hasn’t read the book, you really should. Reading it is such an incredible journey, and Cheryl’s voice—as you saw in the movie—is pretty remarkable; it’s brave and almost shameless, which is tragically unique. We don’t see that kind of voice in film very often, and we rarely read it in books— someone so nakedly displaying their bad choices, and showing their willingness to face those choices without defending them or explaining them.

“I am so moved by Cheryl’s story,” she goes on. “And we shot the movie, in part, where Cheryl lives now, so she was with us for 95 percent of the shoot. She totally opened her heart to us, as she does in her book. She’s fearless, which isn’t to say she hasn’t been afraid in her life. Fearlessness, really, is about being afraid but moving ahead anyway, because you are more scared of who you’d be if you gave into your fears and didn’t do the scary thing, than you are actually afraid of that thing.

“Does that make sense?”

The audience responds with a huge round of applause. That’s audience-speak for, “Yes, that makes sense—and then some.” In a public Q&A, where only some of the audience gets to speak, the crowd often finds other ways to communicate their responses.

“What’s so cool about this movie,” Dern adds, “is that it’s a love story. But unlike most movies about women, the love story isn’t a boy-meets-girl story. It doesn’t involve her falling in love with a guy, or defining herself by finding a relationship with a guy. This is a love story between a daughter and her mother. Everything brave about Cheryl, the way she breathes life into everything and everyone around her—you learn in this movie that all of that comes from her mother.

“Playing this part,” she says, “has actually brought me to a place where I can now fully appreciate, and be grateful for, everything I’ve learned from my mother, and maybe never realized.”

Dern is the daughter of Oscar-nominated actress Diane Ladd (Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore, Wild at Heart, Rambling Rose). Her father is Bruce Dern, nominated last year for his role in Alexander Payne’s Nebraska.

“With his reputation for being a collaborator and improviser on set,” comes Dern’s next question, “what was it like working with Jean-Marc Vallée?”

“He’s a trip,” Dern says with a laugh. “He’s at the top of the list of impassioned filmmakers—someone who won’t stop until he believes he’s captured the truth of a scene. And he is a collaborator. He wants everyone to be part of the party, the cast, the crew, everyone.

“And he’s constantly filming!”

As an example, Dern describes a moment on set where Vallée was looking for Witherspoon, who he’d sent behind a trailer to change clothes a few minutes ago. Dern, by the way, does a spot-on impersonation of Vallée, complete with French accent.

“Where ees Reese! Where ees Reese!” she says, mimicking the director calling for his lead actress. “We said, ‘Jean-Marc, she’s changing her costume. She’ll be back in three minutes,’ and Jean-Marc went, ‘Three meen-utes? Three meen-utes! My god! Weeee are wasteeng time! Fine! Laura! Come here! We weel do a scene!’ And we improvised a scene right there on the spot! Every day was like that. It was amazing!”

“How much of what you did on set ended up in the actual movie?” one fan wants to know.

“All of it!” Dern replies. “Can you believe it? That never happens. Often, when you are working with visionary directors like David Lynch, on three-and-a-half-hour movies, there comes a moment when they call you up and say, ‘I know you were attached to this or that scene, but we had to lose some of that because the film had to come in at a certain length,’ right? Well when Jean-Marc was about to show me the finished movie, outside the editing room, he said, ‘Laura!! Laura! I used every-theeng! You think I am maybe keeding? Remember when I came into your trailer and filmed your make-up test? That’s in the movie, too!’

“He’s so beautiful!” Dern says with a laugh. “He’s just so excited to be making a film, you can’t help but get excited, too. When you’ve been making movies your whole life, like I have, you really appreciate it when someone can make you feel that excitement again. And I think the audience can feel that excitement and danger and risk-taking on screen.

“Know what I mean?”

Tonight’s audience knows.

They tell her the way they do best. With a spontaneous round of applause, to which Laura Dern merely stands, hands clasped, beaming a smile that looks a whole lot like love.

Ask David if he’s ever hiked the Pacific Crest Trail at ta*****@ea*******.net.

Style: Clothing that tips the scales

by Katie Rice Jones

Let’s face it; pouring on the holiday cheer tends to also pour on the pounds. When January finally rolls around, most of us are looking for ways to detox and trim down. Hence we buy gym memberships, start fad diets, and do cleanses. However, even the most “tried and true” weight loss methods are bound to fall short of your expectations (go figure!) if, at the same time, you are wearing the wrong clothes. Yes, wearing the wrong kind of clothing can visually counteract any of your New Year weight loss methods and be very effective at tipping the scales in the wrong direction. That’s why it’s important to understand which fashion designs and modes of dressing fatter you.

Tight pieces
Tight pieces accentuate weight gain, while fitted or tailored separates diminish it. 

Small-ish separates
You will always look thinner in something that is a little too big, while trying to squeeze into something too small will look like you should have sized-up.

Baggy with baggy
To avoid looking massive, never pair baggy with baggy (see photo). If you want to wear an oversized sweater, pair it with either leggings or skinny jeans.

Large-scale prints
Prints are hot this season, but tread carefully when you wear them. Large-scale prints add dimension and volume to your body.

Layers on layers
Just like when wearing baggy clothes, your outfit should balance fitted layers with loose layers.

Shapeless jackets
Don’t hide your weight gain under an oversized, shapeless jacket. It isn’t helping.  Voluminous jackets with little to no waist definition will make you appear larger.

Shiny separates
Sequin and metallics reflect light, thus casting you in a bigger light.

Bulk accessories
From oversized bags to jewelry to snoods, bulky accessories do little to elongate and slim your body.

Katie Rice Jones is the Pacific Sun’s lifestyle editor-at-large, a Marin-based style expert and author of the maternity fashion book titled ‘Fashion Dues & Duen’ts; a Stylist’s Guide to Fashionably Embracing Your Baby Bump’ (Know Act Be Books, 2014). Available NOW at Amazon.com. Learn more at FashionDue.com.

Letters

I want a new drug law

This year and time, let us commemorate the passing of the Harrison Narcotics Act’s 100th anniversary! Here, ladies and gentleman, marks a major turning point of American history, when the menace of deadly, addictive drugs were finally curtailed by turning a moderate medical issue into a major criminal problem. No more cocaine-crazed negroes nor opium-smoking Chinese to cause anybody problems! When our good government realized that the 10th Amendment (granting powers to the states if laws weren’t specifically outlined in the Constitution) became officially null and void. It’s a step in the right direction that states are finally easing up on cannabis, but why shouldn’t this also be applied to all psychoactives? Per a United Kingdom study around 2009, when damage to the user and damage to society are taken into account, alcohol is by far the most damaging drug, yet most of us use it responsibly. To spin it another way, tobacco kills exponentially more than all the others. To weaken organized crime, make the streets safer (due to no more drug wars and less gang turf violence), why isn’t legalization ever discussed as an option? I guess we need more minorities in prison. And the CIA does have to make money somehow, I suppose.

Tony Good, San Rafael

 

All creatures, great and small

Aren’t humans amazing? They kill wildlife—birds, deer, all kinds of cats, coyotes, beavers, groundhogs, mice and foxes by the millions—in order to protect their domestic animals and their feed.

Then they kill domestic animals by the billion and eat them. This in turn kills people by the millions, because eating all those animals leads to degenerative—and fatal—health conditions like heart disease, stroke, kidney disease and cancer.

So then humans spend billions of dollars torturing and killing millions more animals to look for cures for these diseases.

Elsewhere, millions of other human beings are being killed by hunger and malnutrition because food they could eat is being used to fatten domestic animals.

Meanwhile, few people recognize the absurdity of humans, who kill so easily and violently, and then plead for “Peace on Earth.”

C. David Coates, Marin

 

But will they bury him in the endzone at the Meadowlands?

One of the fun realities of the increasingly divided society we call America is that people of means, and their children, can easily shelter themselves from everybody else.

Marin, where I lived for most of my life and helped raise four fine children, is a prime example of this emerging cultural phenomenon.

There are likely more Marinites who have visited Nairobi than Oakland. I stole that one from Chris Rock.

And because more and more people who get themselves elected to positions of higher office, such as in the House and Senate, are people of means, this chronic tendency toward avoidance becomes a problem of representative democracy as well as a social problem.

At one time in this country’s history, in perhaps a more innocent and egalitarian time, the careers of people with political ambitions often were sprung from ordinary neighborhoods, in cities and rural areas.

In many of these neighborhoods, the centers of community and influence were taverns, restaurants, beauty shops, and barbershops, where ambitions were fulfilled one person, one vote, one haircut, and one drink at a time.

So, picture, if you will, a neighborhood bar in a working class section of Chicago. Maybe it’s a joint right out of Jack London’s John Barleycorn, except it’s not in Oakland.

Maybe the surrounding neighborhood has, over the past hundred or so years, sent its share of young men and women to shed blood in the cause of protecting American interests in places such as Baghdad and Kabul, Pleiku and Inchon, Anzio and Alsace.

It’s a place of honest sacrifice, where actual democracy is approved of and in effect pretty much every day.

And then, Dick Cheney walks into this bar. This is a man who has shed a lot of blood in his years of public service, none of it his. He is an acknowledged, visible, righteous, unapologetic, magnificent profiteer of the war industry.

Mr. Cheney takes a seat at the bar, orders a Rob Roy, and begins to defend the torture that he either ordered or tolerated at places such as Abu Graib.

Keep in mind that he is no longer at his ranch in Wyoming. He is not sitting in a boardroom, having coffee and doughnuts with his homies. He is not in the comfort of an interview in a Fox News studio.

A number of patrons recognize him and come near to hear what he has to say for himself.

As they listen, the mood in the bar changes. Smiles are replaced.

Can you imagine what might (should) happen in this scenario?

I can.

And, I can spell Hoffa.

Skip Corsini, San Carlos

 

This is the price we pay for ‘Game of Thrones’ …

I recently experienced an interesting confrontation with the giant media monopoly Comcast. My PC was no longer connecting with the service. When support could not repair the problem remotely, it was suggested I should have a technical expert come by and check the problem. There was no suggestion I would be charged even though the problem was considered potentially a Comcast one. It was on my next bill.

When I checked at the Comcast service office in San Rafael I was told, unless I had purchased the prevention program at a cost of $399, I would be charged no matter if it was a problem with my PC or was a Comcast problem.

This is tantamount to corporate blackmail and illustrates the complete lack of concern for its customers. My location is an irreversible dead zone for satellite coverage, holding customers such as myself hostage to pure greed.

This message was also sent to the FCC.

Alfred Auger, Fairfax

 

Son of a gun

When I was young I had toy guns that mirrored the times. There were no Uzis, AR-15s or AK-47s. We played Army and, yes, even Cowboys and Indians. I grew up in a Midwestern state, my dad hunted and when I got to an age where I was ready to start hunting with him I was taught the responsibility of a real gun. Even though I no longer hunt I still own guns and like to occasionally target practice. I still believe that it’s the person, not the inanimate object, that makes a gun a bad thing and, no, I do not belong to the NRA. We need to look at society on a whole and see where we are heading, and the path is not looking all that rosy. For all the advances we have made in psychology and reasoning we seem to be missing the point. We are quick to blame everything and everyone else for our own personal shortcomings.

Still Rockin’, Marin

Food & Drink: Tasty trends

Html code here! Replace this with any non empty text and that's it.

Top 10 food trends of 2014

by Tanya Henry

As another year comes to a close, like most, it’s a mixed bag—glad to see some things go and already nostalgic about others. Whatever the case, trend or not, here is a roundup of foods and practices we saw quite a bit of in 2014. Some will transcend trend status and continue on into 2015 and beyond—especially if we keep them going—we have the power!

KALE Though I have always been a fan of most leafy greens, I have to say that I am suffering from kale fatigue. The fibrous “superfood,” with its high levels of antioxidants and vitamins C and A, has become far too ubiquitous for my taste. Love it in salads, but does it really have to be dehydrated, drenched in spices and eaten as a snack? Fried and sprinkled on soups, pastas and eggs? Seriously, it doesn’t have to be included in every meal—it’s versatile, but let’s give it a break. Bring on the cauliflower!

FERMENTED FOODS As someone who made kombucha in my apartment in San Francisco in the ’90s and recalls having multiplying mothers taking over my pantry, I can’t help but chuckle to see the trend explode as it has. But kombucha (fermented tea) isn’t the only product leading the way in this frenzy; sauerkraut, kimchi, kefir and yogurt all contain bacteria and yeasts that benefit from this age-old process of converting sugars to acids. Since chefs have jumped on this bandwagon, we are likely to continue to see some interesting permutations and creations—I for one am looking forward to the discovery.

JUICING It seemed that bagels and morning pastries were suddenly replaced by goopy green smoothies and unrecognizable (read unappetizing) liquid concoctions. Kiosks popped up overnight touting their cleanses that included exotic cold-pressed watermelon and rose water combos for a mere $10 for an 8-ounce drink. Strategically placed near yoga studios and health clubs, the trend remains in full swing and the flavors continue to expand—utilizing ginger, vanilla and cinnamon. The Vitamix and other heavy-duty juicers have also enabled us to juice beyond bananas to cucumbers, kale and carrots. Essentially this craze has resulted in the recrafting of the smoothie from a heavy, calorie-laden and mostly fruit beverage, to lighter, vegetable-based drinks that utilize smaller amounts of fruit and larger quantities of vegetables combined with spices to add sweetness.

SRIRACHA I was just fine when this Thai chili garlic sauce was used to add some kick to scrambled eggs, a burger or a burrito. In fact it offered some welcomed competition to the iconic, but one-note Tabasco. But then it got out of hand. Sriracha chocolate and popcorn? Lip balm with spicy Sriracha flavors. No! Ironically a Sriracha factory in Southern California was ordered to shut down after neighbors complained of the spicy smells it was producing. Definitely a case of too much of a good thing.

ANCIENT GRAINS Being the child of hippie parents, I was eating millet—wheat berries and amaranth—before I was 10. With the introduction and accessibility to a host of flavorful and tasty grains—meal choices have expanded exponentially. Not only are grains like faro and spelt great for salads, but incorporating them into breakfast to replace oatmeal allows us to really mix things up. Many are equally tasty combined with nuts and yogurt, or veggies and salad dressing. This trend is especially exciting for vegetarians—I hope it continues.

UMAMI It seems like this trend has been years in the making. Initially it was likely the negative association with MSG that caused the savory flavor trend to come to a screeching halt. Now with the L.A.-based chain Umami Burger popping up throughout the state, and Asian food more popular than ever—this “savory fifth taste” is definitely on the radar. Asian sauces, salts and soups often include umami, along with plenty of foods like beef, tomatoes and mushrooms that already have the flavor naturally occurring in their makeup.

GLUTEN-FREE Though I’m amused to see packaging for items like oatmeal, shampoo and almond milk touting their “gluten-free” status, in the end, this trend seems to be helping folks with any sensitivities around wheat, lead more flavorful and pain-free lives. The number of GF products available on large grocery store shelves continues to grow by the day. Clearly this is something whose time had come. There is even a beautifully photographed quarterly magazine created here in San Francisco titled Gluten-Free Forever that will make even the most die-hard wheat-eater swoon. Check it out here: www.gffmag.com.

FOOD DELIVERY SERVICES It seems like another meal delivery service pops up every day. Between Blue Apron, Munchery and AgLocal, you can now choose to have complete meals delivered to your doorstep, choice cuts of meat from local ranchers, or a mystery box of fresh fruits and vegetables in CSA boxes. This is not a new idea, but it appears that the infrastructure and distribution models have improved so much that the chances of going bankrupt like Webvan did 20 years ago are just a vague memory.

FOOD HALLS As more and more of us become food-obsessed, large food emporiums or halls are in planning stages or already opened in cities across the country. Several such halls are slated for various neighborhoods in San Francisco, and one has already arrived at 6th and Market streets. The hall features multiple vendors offering everything from artisan coffee, sustainable seafood and curry and Vietnamese food. Unlike previous markets, this new breed tends to focus on sustainable, artisanal, handcrafted and local.

LOCAL, LOCAL, LOCAL With many folks dedicated to “decreasing the size of their carbon footprints,” a noticeable shift toward buying from and supporting local businesses continues to resonate. Chefs, specialty food producers and we the consumers, are eating and shopping closer to home. Though it’s not likely the big box stores will close their doors anytime soon, there is an ever-growing awareness of the importance to support our local communities by keeping our dollars closer to home.

Share your end-of-the-year hunger pains with Tanya at th****@pa********.com.

Feature: Breaking the news

0

Html code here! Replace this with any non empty text and that's it.

A roundup of top local stories from 2014, in case you’ve been under a rock.

by Molly Oleson

Drakes Bay Oyster Company proves yet again that it will not go down without a fight. In July, the U.S. Court put an end to owner Kevin Lunny’s legal challenge to a Nov. 2012 decision not to renew a 40-year-old permit to harvest oysters in federally protected waters. Around two weeks later, in a last-ditch effort to save the West Marin company (which had agreed to halt operations by Dec. 31), a coalition of farmers and restaurant owners entered the saga with a case that claimed that the shuttering would result in an economic blow to the county. A U.S. District judge faulted the case for “a complete lack of merit,” and a February hearing on its dismissal is scheduled. Meanwhile, Lunny has announced plans to open a seafood restaurant in Inverness.
On Aug. 11, Oscar-winning actor and comedian Robin Williams was found dead in his Tiburon home. An investigation into the death by the Marin County Sheriff’s Office Coroner Division revealed that Williams committed suicide by asphyxia due to hanging. A toxicological evaluation showed that prescription medications in therapeutic concentrations were found, as well as the absence of alcohol or illicit drugs. In October, the Throckmorton Theatre hosted a celebration of life event, where longtime friends of Williams shared memories and laughs with a sold-out crowd.
The latest on the hot-button housing issue in Marin: After much debate between housing proponents and higher-density critics, the Board of Supervisors votes unanimously to approve the housing element, which will guide development through 2023. The 419-unit proposal from county planners was cut to a total of 378 units by the board. Of that total number, the element calls for 210 low-income units, 70 moderate-income units and 98 market-rate units. Slow-growth in Marin continues.
In August, the Marin County Open Space District (MCOSD) released a recirculated Draft Tiered Program Environmental Impact Report for its first comprehensive Road and Trail Management Plan—which aims to direct future use and management of roads and trails on the MCOSD’s 34 preserves. Receiving numerous comments from the public on the report, the MCOSD released a final Environmental Impact Report in November. Further comments led to a memorandum this month to the MCOSD Board of Directors, incorporating and responding to the comments. One day, there will be peace on the county’s trails.
The Marin Organizing Committee (MOC) met in October to discuss the next steps in creating a permanent shelter for the homeless in Marin. A total of $1.25 million is the goal to keep such a place open for one year. Seeking commitments from the county’s 11 towns to fund a shelter, the MOC was greeted with open arms by Fairfax, the first town to agree to donate money to the cause. Councilman Larry Bragman attributes the generosity to the town’s social consciousness and progressiveness. Which town will step up next?
It may finally be raining buckets, Marin, but that doesn’t mean that we’ve forgotten about the alarmingly dry state of things this year. According to scientists with the University of Minnesota and Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in Massachusetts, the California drought of 2014 was the most severe dry spell in at least 1,200 years. While the Marin Municipal Water District offered hands-on activities on Earth Day to educate families about sustainability solutions—addressing drought, climate change and the future of water conservation, WaterNow—a nonprofit “tackling the water crisis by jump-starting sustainable water solutions in communities”—began a partnership with the county. A pilot project is underway to boost Marin’s water supply by promoting the use of graywater.
Climate change is for real. This year, Marin took steps to address growing concern about threats to the environment and human safety. Released in August, the Marin County Climate Action Plan Update 2014 builds on the 2006 GHG Reduction Plan and provides an update of greenhouse gas emissions in 2012. It also includes an assessment of actions that Marin will take to further reduce emissions by 2020. According to the report, the proposed new community emissions target would put the county on the forefront of climate action planning in the state. Way to lead, Marin!
Major progress has been made in the last year on the Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit (SMART) project. Construction has included everything from in-ground infrastructure to above-ground tunnels to old track removal and new track installation. It won’t be long before we start hearing those whistles.
The situation is dire when it comes to Marin’s aging population. A 30-page report titled, “Aging in Marin: What’s the Plan,” which was issued in June by a civil grand jury and examines the county’s ability to provide for its senior citizens, concludes that there is a lack of a long-term, strategic and financial plan in place. According to the report, one in four residents of Marin is 60 years or older, and by 2030, one in three residents will be a senior. As the population ages, service demands will rise. But with a declining number of people available to help with that demand, many seniors will find themselves unable to meet their needs for food, housing, transportation and medical care.

Let Molly know if this is news to you at mo*****@pa********.com.

Heros of Marin: Heidi Kuhn

by Molly Oleson

It all began with a toast. Raising a glass in her San Rafael home more than 17 years ago, Heidi Kuhn, a fifth-generation Marinite and mother of four, had an epiphany. Deeply inspired by the defining work of the late Princess Diana—who the world had lost just three weeks prior—Kuhn had a strong vision to turn landmines into vineyards.
“It was an epiphany from my heart,” says Kuhn, sitting in the backyard of her home, passed on to her from her grandparents and overlooking the bay. “That the world may go from mines to vines. And you could hear a pin drop. It was an epiphany of turning—almost a visual, of blood to wine, killing fields to vineyards, peace on earth.”t all began with a toast. Raising a glass in her San Rafael home more than 17 years ago, Heidi Kuhn, a fifth-generation Marinite and mother of four, had an epiphany. Deeply inspired by the demining work of the late Princess Diana—who the world had lost just three weeks prior—Kuhn had a strong vision to turn landmines into vineyards.

People around the globe, Kuhn says, understood that the passing of Princess Diana was not just the passing of a princess, but of somebody who stood for compassion. “And the passion she brought through the issues she shed light to.”

Kuhn says that she wanted to give her dinner guests that night something very meaningful, and ensure that the work of Princess Diana would be carried on. “I looked at the kaleidoscope around where we stood and I thought, the Napa vintners, the Sonoma vintners, the Marin vintners—these people harvest the land, they celebrate the harvest, they smell the juicy nectar of the grapes,” Kuhn says. “Whether fermented or not, this is life.”

Encouraged by her guests to take her toast out of the living room and into the world, Kuhn presented her idea in Napa Valley the following week. Support from key vintners like Robert Mondavi, Mike Grgich and Diane Disney Miller—“pioneers and dreamers in their own right”—led to the 1998 launch of Roots of Peace, an organization dedicated to replacing landmines in war-torn regions worldwide with bountiful agriculture.

“We need to focus on the economics of peace,” says Kuhn, founder and CEO of Roots of Peace and recipient of the Pacific Sun’s 2014 Heroes of Marin Lifetime Achievement award. “We need to empower people. We need to provide food security on war-torn lands. We need to help heal communities. And to me that begins by the removal of a simple landmine—it’s a metaphor of hatred, and it’s a physical example, but we need to begin that act of removing the hatred from our one soil and then literally planting the roots of peace.”

Since the global initiative began, Roots of Peace has removed more than one million landmines and unexploded ordnances from continents across the globe, and has helped more than one million farmers to improve orchards and crops. “Like little Johnny Appleseed, I go around the world, giving people cards and inviting them to join me,” Kuhn says. “We’ve planted rice in Cambodia, grapes in Afghanistan, orchards in Croatia, flowers in Bosnia.”

Kuhn refers to her work as “changing the tide of hatred into love” by restoring damaged communities to economic self-sufficiency. “When you plant a seed, regardless of the color of your hand, the politics in your mind or the faith in your heart, that seed will grow, as it has for thousands of years,” she says.

A deep respect for the land can be traced back to Kuhn’s family roots in Marin County. Her great-great-grandfather sailed to California from Maine in the early 1850s, purchasing thousands of acres of land in what is now Marin and Sonoma. Her grandfather was president of the Rotary Club of San Francisco in the early 1940s, and his legacy was to help establish what was to be called the United Nations.

“For me, Marin County is really about the land and its people,” says Kuhn, noting that the original model for the Golden Gate Bridge was once laid out on her living room table, when her grandparents lived in the house and hosted a fellow “dreamer” who wanted to “turn his vision into reality.”

Kuhn’s grandmother, she says, encouraged her to dedicate her life to doing something for peace. “And to take those riches that we derive from the land and from its people, and to bring that beautiful spirit of Marin County out into a world that is so thirsty, so hungry … for love.”

A graduate of San Rafael High School, Kuhn holds a degree in political economics of industrial societies from UC Berkeley. A reporter and producer for CNN and other news organizations in the ’80s and ’90s, Kuhn was living in Alaska with her husband, who was working for IBM and who is now the president of Roots of Peace. She then went on to begin her own television news organization—NewsLink International—reporting on the Exxon Valdez oil spill and the melting of the Ice Curtain between U.S./Soviet relations.

The road hasn’t always been smooth. Before the birth of her fourth child, Kuhn was diagnosed with malignant cancer and told that she would not live. “That stops you in your tracks,” she says. “But it can also either paralyze you or make you realize that each day is a gift.”

She’s held on to the latter. “That’s the way I’ve always chosen to live my life,” she says. “I’ve just had to lead with faith, not fear, and be that pioneer woman that I know my great-great-grandfather would be very proud of.”

Although Kuhn is honored to win the Lifetime Achievement award, she says she’s far from done with her work. Her biggest goal? “World peace,” she says, without missing a beat. “Don’t blink.”

“It’s in my soul; it’s in my DNA; it’s in my spirit; it’s in my mind; it’s in my intelligence, to do whatever I can with the human footsteps that I have, and with these hands, to inspire the world to not forget the legacy of war,” she says. “Those beautiful leaders who have been in my life—let’s use them and draw upon that inspiration and believe in the world what is possible rather than what’s not.”

Hero FYI

  • Kuhn has been honored with the Cal Berkeley Alumni Award for Excellence and Achievement and the Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis Award/National Jefferson Award for Public Service, among other local and international recognitions.
  • She recently launched a crowd-rise campaign, sponsored by Jeff Skoll (co-founder of eBay) in which people around the world can participate in a “virtual walkathon” for peace.
  • Kuhn says that political landmines have been her biggest challenge, and that her most gut-wrenching experience has been the Taliban’s attack on Afghanistan—a country 80 percent dependent on agriculture—this past May.
  • Most rewarding has been “the farmers and the families on the ground,” Kuhn says. “It’s the face of my children and my husband, and it’s the light in the eyes of the children around the world that keeps me going.”

 

Heroes of Marin: Emily Sims

by Stephanie Powell

I don’t see myself as a role model,” says Emily Sims, founder of West Marin Advocacy, the driving force behind the Marin County Human Trafficking Task Force and recipient of this year’s Pacific Sun Heroes of Marin Role Model award. “I just see myself sort of trying to survive every day in Marin County.”
Raised in Marin, Sims spent her elementary years at San Anselmo’s Wade Thomas and a year at Branson on scholarship. It wasn’t until she began attending Sir Francis Drake High School when she really began to grasp a larger sense of Marin’s community.don’t see myself as a role model,” says Emily Sims, founder of West Marin Advocacy, the driving force behind the Marin County Human Trafficking Task Force and recipient of this year’s Pacific Sun Heroes of Marin Role Model award. “I just see myself sort of trying to survive every day in Marin County.”

“[It] really opened my eyes to what I wanted to be a part of in Marin County and what I didn’t want to be a part of,” Sims says, speaking about her experience at the Branson School and the eye-opening financial disparity that can be found within the county. “I realized that folks that had less, who were sort of judged as being less than, were the folks that actually had the most compassion.”

In her teens, Sims moved with her mom to Canada, where she had a formative experience with law enforcement that, little did she know, would precipitate an influential career shift.

“I saw friends whose parents treated them poorly—both when I lived [in Marin] and when I lived in Canada. I remember one instance, when I lived in Montreal, a friend of mine was beaten by her father and [the police] didn’t do anything,” Sims says. “They said that it was normal, and that parents were allowed to beat their children.”

It was that disconnect, Sims says, that propelled her into her career in advocacy work and into establishing West Marin Advocacy (WMA)—a nonprofit based in West Marin that provides direct, confidential advocacy services to survivors of community and family violence. WMA offers a breadth of services from assisting survivors of domestic violence and sexual assault to working with clients who have had unfavorable experiences with law enforcement and mediating between the parties to achieve whatever goal the client may be seeking—from obtaining a restraining order to filing a police report.

“I guess there’s a side of me that made me feel angry,” Sims says, “when I would see someone have the courage to call the police and then law enforcement not treating that person accordingly or not assisting them.”

Sims started by making a move back to California in 2002 and studying political science at Golden Gate University, which opened up the opportunity to work in the domestic violence unit of the San Francisco Police Department. While garnering first-hand experience in advocacy alongside officers, Sims was secretly fighting a battle of her own—she was in an abusive relationship from ages 19 to 21.

“It was hard,” Sims says of working on domestic violence cases while simultaneously experiencing personal abuse. “[It was] shameful, terrifying. I was pretty isolated from my family. I think that it’s the perfect example that anyone can go through an abusive relationship because looking from the outside in, I had an education, I was working and I think that sometimes when people have a lot at stake it makes that abuse feel even more profound.”

But Sims, a survivor of the abuse, never let her experience define her. She continued her education at Sonoma State University, focusing on interdisciplinary studies—a blend between public administration and women’s and gender studies.

It was at the end of 2009 when Sims founded WMA, which she says initially started as “very grassroots.”

“When I came back to Marin, and because of the work I did in San Francisco, friends would call me if they needed a restraining order,” Sims says, “or people would call me if they tried to make a police report and hadn’t been assisted in an appropriate way.”

Sims cites geography as a leading motivation for starting her agency. “A lot of people were not getting the services that they were entitled to because of geography,” she says. “You know we have county agencies, and a lot of them are centered in San Rafael, and for folks who live over the hill or in West Marin, it’s just geographically difficult to get to those agencies.”

West Marin Advocacy, Sims says, receives about four to five calls per week—the most common of which come from domestic violence or sexual assault survivors looking for housing or shelter.

“I like to provide services for people who are homeless as well and let them know that they can still live with dignity—that you can not have an address and still be a vital part of our community,” Sims says. “Being a service provider in the community [is to] recognize someone for their value, not for their socioeconomic status—that’s really important to me.”

But it was her thesis, “Social Service and Law Enforcement Responses to Human Trafficking,” that would end up sparking a blaze in Marin’s community agency circuit.

“I was interested in looking at what our county was doing to address human trafficking,” Sims says. “It was a really hot-button issue for other counties in the Bay Area and it was a little head-scratching why people weren’t looking at it in Marin County.”

During her research, Sims says, she spoke to members from the County of Marin Probation Department to the District Attorney’s Office to the Human Rights Commission to further explore human trafficking’s presence in Marin.

“[The agencies] did a Google search and the only thing that came up was my thesis,” she says. “So we started working together to try and get more awareness to the general public that this is an issue that is happening here. When I kind of identified that there was a need for community awareness, there was a huge response from law enforcement and community agencies.”

That response formed the Marin County Human Trafficking Task Force, a collaboration of agencies that includes the DA’s office, the Dominican Sisters of San Rafael and Health and Human Services. From April to October of this year alone, the task force has identified and provided referrals to 27 human trafficking survivors countywide.

Sims is quick to add that human trafficking doesn’t just mean “a mass amount of people moving huge distances.” It’s force-, fear- and coercion-based, she says. “It’s not just people being brought into the country hidden or tucked away. It could be someone who is from Marin County who is being forced to work against [his or her] will.”

With the increased involvement of Marin’s agencies in the task force, Sims is able to shift her focus back on WMA, her friends and family.

“My role models are my peers,” Sims says, speaking matter-of-factly about her close-knit network. “Working moms and people who manage to work and care for their kids without the ability to pay for full-time child care. Pretty much all of the women that I grew up with—they are the people that when I want to stay in bed, I think of them and it’s sort of like a really positive peer pressure.”

Hero FYI

  • What does Sims do for fun? “Clean the house when I’m not working!” she says with a laugh.
  • When asked about her most rewarding accomplishment, without hesitation Sims says, “My daughters.”
  • In October, WMA and the Marin County Human Trafficking Task Force started a campaign around the county for human trafficking. Images of labor trafficking were provided by a federal campaign and appeared at 40 bus stops.

 

Upfront: School of thoughts

by Peter Seidman

Rather than calm the debate over a proposed affordable housing project in Marinwood, a study the county commissioned to quantify the effects of a proposed development created new lines drawn in the sand.

A respected economist, Robert Eyler, presented the study recently to the Board of Supervisors. Eyler is head of the Marin Economic Forum, a professor and chair of economics at Sonoma State. The study aims to delineate the effects of a housing development in Marinwood that would include 72 units of below-market-rate housing and 10 units of market-rate units. The study includes potential effects on the Dixie School District.

The data included in the study about the effects of the project on local schools comes after opponents have raised objections to the project based, they say, on the deleterious financial consequence of allowing a developer to build the 72 units of below-market-rate housing.

The objections open a can of debate that involves the complicated and arcane procedure by which the state funds schools.

The Dixie School District is what’s called a basic aid district, which means that local property taxes make up the bulk of its general fund revenue. That’s because as part of the state’s school-funding mechanism for a basic aid school district, the district’s per-pupil-property tax revenue exceeds the state per-pupil revenue allocation limit. That means that the district is left to rely in large part on local property taxes.

An affordable housing project such as Marinwood Plaza, which the BRIDGE Housing Corporation has proposed, can throw a wrench into school funding projections. Affordable units, like the ones BRIDGE wants to build, can qualify for a property tax waver. The school district and property owners in the district would have to take up the responsibility to cover the education costs for children in the affordable units if they wanted to keep per-pupil funding stable.

Whether that’s an unfair burden or a fair social responsibility depends on which side of the debate a person stakes a position. There’s no question that the Dixie School District, which has three elementary schools for kindergarten through eighth grade, is, like most districts, revenue-challenged. Currently about 2,000 students attend classes.

BRIDGE Housing Corporation formed in 1983 when the San Francisco Foundation received a major anonymous grant aimed at creating solutions to the dearth of affordable housing in the Bay Area. Since then, Bridge has earned a firm reputation as a responsible creator of affordable housing that blends with the surrounding neighborhood. The agency’s track record regarding management of the developments it creates is likewise respected.

At one time, Bridge estimated that about only 44 students would be added to the immediate attendance rolls from the Marinwood Plaza development. Not all of the children who will live in the units would be of elementary school age at the same time, note proponents of the proposal, and that would lessen the financial effect on Dixie schools. The influx won’t be an avalanche. Based on the number of bedrooms, it’s not out of the question to estimate that between 44 students and, say, about 100 students would be added to Dixie School District classes.

If Bridge builds the development and receives waivers, the local community would face a shortfall in school funding that would affect the added pupils and also the current children in Dixie schools, say opponents of the proposal.

The objection dovetailed into the anti-government sentiment that erupted in the November election. In that election, San Rafael Councilman Damon Connolly ousted Susan Adams to take a seat on the Board of Supervisors, based in part on a campaign platform of slow-growth, especially when it came to Marinwood. He stated that the county should reset its thinking on the development proposal. Supervisor Judy Arnold, who won reelection in her Novato district by a narrow margin, recently said that 72 affordable units might be too many for the neighborhood, essentially supporting Connolly’s call for a reset.

The political fallout came after strong objections from Marinwood neighbors and often-raucous meetings during which emotions spilled out, swamping a rational debate that the Eyler study seeks to establish.

There’s an irony in the debate over Marinwood that stretches back to the start of discussions about a possible project. “Jerry” Hoytt built some of the first houses in Marinwood in the 1950s. Marinwood Plaza, at the corner of Miller Creek Road and Marinwood Avenue, served as a focal point for neighbors in the west side of Highway 101 between Terra Linda and Novato.

The plaza went into decline, and starting in 2004 local residents began working on a landmark cooperative effort with Hoytt and the county to determine the best route to rehabilitation for the little shopping area. To Jerry Hoytt’s credit, he reached out to the community to fashion a front-loaded planning process for the property. If the community would support a redevelopment plan early in the planning process, and the county would ease the way for construction (Marinwood is unincorporated), selling the property would be much easier for Hoytt. The process also would help ease the way for smooth planning because neighborhood stakeholders already would have thrown in their support.

That kind of front-loaded planning process had never happened to successful completion in Marin. The idea to develop a community consensus before entering the formal planning stage was aimed at forestalling the kind of community revolt that occurred in Novato, where neighbors said that they had never realized the full consequences of a proposal for a new Whole Foods. Neighbors in Mill Valley that had a similar shock when they realized that the town was embarking on a major renovation of Miller Avenue. Despite numerous public meetings in both towns, residents said that they had been unaware of planning strategies, details and consequences.

The irony is that Adams played a key role in creating the front-loaded community consensus strategy in Marinwood, where she lives near Marinwood Plaza. A local task force formed, the Marinwood Village Collaborative. Early on it included numerous individuals from the neighborhood, organizations and county government representatives. The collaborative, Hoytt and the county worked and reworked redevelopment proposals. In 2006, county supervisors endorsed a proposal for a grocery store, ancillary retail, a community plaza and a redesign of Marinwood Avenue. The conceptual plan also included a housing component. The county identified the area as suitable for new housing and contemplated a target of making up to half of the units built qualify as affordable. The idea is that Marinwood is particularly appropriate for affordable units because it’s near the freeway and public transportation, and a revamped plaza would put the housing units near shopping.

The concept called for building up to 100 housing units. The Bridge proposal represents a considerable reduction. Even so, calls to reduce the number of units on the site continued. Eventually, Bridge settled on the 82-unit figure. The corporation was the only entity that brought a practical development plan to the county.

The argument that the affordable units—and the property tax waivers they could bring—would harm the Dixie School District added to the emotional paroxysm that slow-growth/no-growth advocates were espousing, especially those who looked with a particularly unfavorable eye at what they call high-density development.

The Marin Economic Forum study, among other criteria, is an attempt to look at the numbers to determine their effect—without emotion—on local schools.

The Marinwood neighborhood is an above-average socio-economic area. The median income is $130,000 a year—well above the county average. To maintain school funding at current per-pupil levels after the Bridge project, homeowners might have to contribute more property tax to their local schools. Opponents call that an unfair burden. Proponents of adding affordable housing say it might be a burden, but it’s the socially responsible thing to do to move toward a more diverse community. And that’s what lights the emotional match.

If the Dixie School District remains a basic aid district and must rely in large part on local taxes to fund its schools, how much would local homeowners have to contribute on an annual basis to maintain stable funding with the added pupils? As so many things concerning school finances, much is uncertain, a fact the Marin Economic Forum study acknowledges. But if, for estimate’s sake, the district receives no additional funds from the state, the cost for those additional students could be borne by the 2,351 households in Marinwood (again for estimate’s sake) to maintain stable per-pupil funding. (Marinwood has 84.2 percent owner-occupied housing. For estimation, it’s safe to assume that property owners would increase rents to cover increased property taxes.)

According to the Marin Economic Forum study, “If the new housing units increase school enrollments without commensurate increases in revenues, given current projections of land improvements and property taxes that would come from such enrollments, there is an implicit loss of $251 per student per year.” That would hold true for 45 added students. That means the $251 per-pupil per year would have to be apportioned out among 2,351 households (for estimate’s sake), if the goal is to keep per-pupil funding stable. The 45 pupils would add $11,295 a year to school costs. Divided by the (estimated) number of households, each household would be responsible for funding approximately an extra $5 a year to recoup the implicit loss estimated in the Marin Economic Forum study.

If 100 students enter Dixie schools, the study states, “The reduction would be $559 per pupil.” That could mean an annual added tax per household of $24, if neighbors wanted to maintain stable per-pupil funding.

Projections can be tricky things, but the calculations lay out the ballpark in which Dixie Schools would play if the Bridge project added students—and if property owners in the district agreed that funding their local schools to educate the kids in the development is a worthy endeavor.

The Dixie School District might not be totally reliant on local taxes to fund the added pupils. It depends on state school funding mechanisms, an always hard-to-estimate variable. But as the Marin Economic Forum study states, “If property taxes grow more quickly than expected, Dixie schools may be basic aid schools and not receive state funding.” On the other hand, the study continues, “If the increase in new students is large enough, Dixie may continue to be state-funded due to enrollment growth outpacing local revenue growth.”

After meeting a rather harsh unveiling, the Marin Economic Forum study is due for a peer review to corroborate its numbers and estimates and assumptions.

The Bridge proposal currently is on hold as the corporation negotiates what could be a larger property purchase than the original 3.5 acres included in the residential proposal.

That altered element, in addition to the fallout from the November election, which followed vociferous objections and political action from opponents, are signs that attitudes are hardening in Marin. The Marin Economic Forum study is a chance to digest the numbers and give Marin residents the opportunity to determine whether they want to welcome or reject a development like the Bridge proposal.

“No study or data exists to make a precise estimate of the number of students Dixie Schools will receive from the new units,” the study concludes, “or the type of households that will be formed. This study provides ways to frame the future discourse in a way that focuses on the major variables involved rather than classic arguments seen in Marin County that are neighborhood-specific. The academic literature suggests that framing the question around economic and social variables of interest and not the opinions of neighbors helps make better decisions and plan for shaping public resources.”

It also opens the possibility for rational compromise.

Contact the writer at pe***@ps******.com.

 

Upfront: A house divided

County passes housing element—what does this mean for affordable housing in Marin? by Peter Seidman As the year rolled to an end, the county put a period on the next round of its housing element. The Board of Supervisors earlier this month on a unanimous vote approved the element, which guides housing development through 2023. Marin residents, however, remain far from unanimous...

Feature: The getaway

The Getaway by Pacific Sun
Marin bars that offer a New Year's chance for refreshment and contemplation by Samantha Campos and Matthew Stafford As the old year diminishes and the New Year beckons, reflection and contemplation become inevitable. What you need right about now is a moment to get away from it all, to think, to reconnect, maybe even to rediscover. The classic venue for reflection...

Talking Pictures: Wild and wooly

Wild review by Pacific Sun
MVFF audience applauds Laura Dern as she talks latest film ‘Wild’  by David Templeton Laura Dern is leaning against the wall, at the rear of the Christopher B. Smith Rafael Film Center, as a series of clips plays on screen—Mask, Smooth Talk, Blue Velvet, Citizen Ruth, Jurassic Park, The Fault in Our Stars—each featuring a typically luminous performance by Dern. As...

Style: Clothing that tips the scales

Tipping the Scales
by Katie Rice Jones Let's face it; pouring on the holiday cheer tends to also pour on the pounds. When January finally rolls around, most of us are looking for ways to detox and trim down. Hence we buy gym memberships, start fad diets, and do cleanses. However, even the most "tried and true" weight loss methods are bound to fall...

Letters

Pacific Sun
I want a new drug law This year and time, let us commemorate the passing of the Harrison Narcotics Act’s 100th anniversary! Here, ladies and gentleman, marks a major turning point of American history, when the menace of deadly, addictive drugs were finally curtailed by turning a moderate medical issue into a major criminal problem. No more cocaine-crazed negroes nor...

Food & Drink: Tasty trends

Tasty Trends by Pacific Sun
Top 10 food trends of 2014 by Tanya Henry As another year comes to a close, like most, it’s a mixed bag—glad to see some things go and already nostalgic about others. Whatever the case, trend or not, here is a roundup of foods and practices we saw quite a bit of in 2014. Some will transcend trend status and continue...

Feature: Breaking the news

Save Drakes Oysters by Pacific Sun
A roundup of top local stories from 2014, in case you've been under a rock. by Molly Oleson Drakes Bay Oyster Company proves yet again that it will not go down without a fight. In July, the U.S. Court put an end to owner Kevin Lunny’s legal challenge to a Nov. 2012 decision not to renew a 40-year-old permit to harvest...

Heros of Marin: Heidi Kuhn

Heidi Kuhn - Hero of Marin
by Molly Oleson It all began with a toast. Raising a glass in her San Rafael home more than 17 years ago, Heidi Kuhn, a fifth-generation Marinite and mother of four, had an epiphany. Deeply inspired by the defining work of the late Princess Diana—who the world had lost just three weeks prior—Kuhn had a strong vision to turn landmines into...

Heroes of Marin: Emily Sims

Emily Sims - Role Model
by Stephanie Powell I don't see myself as a role model,” says Emily Sims, founder of West Marin Advocacy, the driving force behind the Marin County Human Trafficking Task Force and recipient of this year’s Pacific Sun Heroes of Marin Role Model award. “I just see myself sort of trying to survive every day in Marin County.” Raised in Marin, Sims spent...

Upfront: School of thoughts

by Peter Seidman Rather than calm the debate over a proposed affordable housing project in Marinwood, a study the county commissioned to quantify the effects of a proposed development created new lines drawn in the sand. A respected economist, Robert Eyler, presented the study recently to the Board of Supervisors. Eyler is head of the Marin Economic Forum, a professor and...
3,002FansLike
3,850FollowersFollow